Aggravated Assault

Consult our Lawyers

What Is Aggravated Assault?

Aggravated assault is one of the most serious violent offences under the Canadian Criminal Code. It occurs when an assault goes beyond causing pain or ordinary bodily harm and results in severe injuries, permanent damage, or a real risk to the victim’s life.blessures extrêmement graves, une défiguration, une mutilation ou lorsque la vie de la victime est mise en danger.

Under section 268 of the Criminal Code, a person commits aggravated assault if they wound, maim, disfigure, or endanger the life of another person. Because of the seriousness of the harm involved, aggravated assault is treated as a strictly indictable offence, carrying the possibility of lengthy prison sentences.

Consent is not a defence where the conduct involves prohibited forms of bodily harm, including certain forms of genital mutilation, except in very limited circumstances expressly permitted by law.blesse, mutile, défigure une autre personne ou met sa vie en danger.

Contact Us
procuring-image

Essential Elements of Aggravated Assault

To obtain a conviction for aggravated assault, the Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements.

Intentional Application of Force

The accused must have intentionally applied force to another person. The act must be voluntary and deliberate — accidental contact is not sufficient.

Absence of Valid Consent

The complainant must not have given valid consent to the application of force. Consent is invalid if it was obtained through force, threats, fear, fraud, abuse of authority, or in situations where the law specifically excludes consent.hors de tout doute raisonnable chacun des éléments suivants.

Objective Foreseeability of Bodily Harm

The Crown does not need to prove that the accused intended to cause serious injury. Instead, the test is objective:

Would a reasonable person in the same circumstances have foreseen that bodily harm could result from the accused’s actions?

Courts have repeatedly confirmed that objective foresight of bodily harm is sufficient to establish the required mental element for aggravated assault.

Serious Nature of the Injuries

Finally, the injuries must meet the high threshold set by section 268. The Crown must prove that the complainant was:

  • Wounded;
  • Maimed;
  • Disfigured; or
  • Exposed to conduct that endangered their life.

The injuries do not need to be permanent, but they must be significantly more serious than those required for assault causing bodily harm.

Key Legal Principles from the Courts

Canadian appellate courts have clarified several important points about aggravated assault:pas nécessaire que l’accusé ait voulu causer des blessures graves.

  • Le critère est objectif : The Crown does not need to prove an intent to wound, maim, or disfigure — objective foreseeability of bodily harm is enough.personne raisonnable, placée dans les mêmes circonstances, aurait-elle prévu que des lésions corporelles pouvaient résulter du comportement reproché?
  • Permanent injuries are not required to establish the offence.prévision objective de lésions corporelles suffit pour établir l’élément moral de l’infraction.
  • Endangering life involves intentionally exposing the victim to a real risk of death, which is different from attempted murder.
  • Assault causing bodily harm is a lesser included offence within aggravated assault, depending on the evidence.
hand-image

Practical Example

During a violent altercation, a person repeatedly strikes another individual in the face with a blunt object. The victim suffers facial fractures and internal bleeding and requires emergency surgery.

Even if the attacker did not intend to kill the victim, the severity of the injuries and the clear danger to the victim’s life are sufficient to constitute aggravated assault under section 268 of the Criminal Code.voies de fait graves au sens de l’article 268 du Code criminel.

Possible Penalties for Aggravated Assault

Aggravated assault is a strictly indictable offence under section 268(2) of the Criminal Code.infraction criminelle exclusivement poursuivie par acte criminel.

  • Maximum penalty: up to 14 years of imprisonment14 ans d’emprisonnement
  • There is no mandatory minimum sentence, but jail sentences are common due to the seriousness of the offence.

Sentencing depends heavily on the facts of the case, the nature of the injuries, and the accused’s personal circumstances.

Contact Us
hand-image

Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

Courts consider several factors when determining an appropriate sentence.

Aggravating Factors at Sentencing

Courts may impose harsher sentences when aggravating factors are present, including:

  • Life-threatening or multiple injuries;
  • Use of a weapon or prolonged violence;
  • Permanent scarring or disfigurement;
  • Vulnerable victims (intimate partners, children, unconscious or intoxicated persons);
  • Prior convictions for violent offences;
  • Offences committed in public or in the presence of minors.
Mitigating Factors

Factors that may reduce the sentence include:

  • No prior criminal record;
  • Genuine remorse and acceptance of responsibility;
  • Early guilty plea;
  • Participation in therapy, counselling, or addiction treatment;
  • Evidence of strong rehabilitation prospects;
  • An isolated, unplanned incident.
hand-image

Sentencing Ranges

While every case is fact-specific, courts have imposed sentences in approximately the following ranges:

  • Blessures graves, aucun antécédentSerious injuries, no prior record: 2 to 4 years imprisonment
  • Usage d’une arme ou violence répétéeUse of a weapon or sustained violence: 4 to 8 years imprisonment
  • Conduite mettant la vie en danger ou récidive violenteLife-endangering conduct or repeat violent offences: 8 years or more

Aggravating Circumstance — Public Transit Operators

When sentencing for offences under sections 266 to 269 of the Criminal Code, including aggravated assault, the court must treat it as an aggravating circumstance if the victim was a public transit operator acting in the course of their duties.conducteur de véhicule de transport en commun dans l’exercice de ses fonctions, le tribunal est tenu de considérer cette situation comme une circonstance aggravante lors de la détermination de la peine.

This includes operators of buses, taxis, trains, subways, streetcars, ferries, and school buses.

Contact Us
hand-image

Contact Lesperance Avocats

Do you have questions? Are you looking for criminal lawyers who accept legal aid mandates? Contact us now!

Submit
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

You Don’t Have to Face This Alone

A single conversation can give you clarity and direction. Contact us now and we'll help you understand your options and take the next step with confidence.

Contact Us
PicturePicture
Back-top